There is patent for eating counter apparatus for mobile vending vehicle and seating apparatus therefor issued by the USPTO. This patent is for an eating counter apparatus for mounting to a three or four-wheeled, motorized or pedal-powered vehicle used as at least part of a mobile food vending eatery whereby to utilize the vehicle to provide an eating area for the patrons of the eatery. The eating counter apparatus also may mount a seating apparatus arranged to support seated patrons about the vehicle as they eat at the counter of the eatery vehicle.
This patent, although issued, seems to violate the non-obvious requirement of patents. The idea of this patent really is a combination of 2 commonly seen things: a food stall, and a food truck. Such a simple combination seems quite obvious to a general person. Also linked to this idea of non-obviousness is novelty. Because it is such an easy combination, it is highly likely that such an idea has been thought of before and documented.
With this idea being non-obvious and not novel, it seems highly like that this patent could be invalidated easily when the owner of this patent sues truck vendors for any infringement.
I suppose it depends on when the patent is being filed. It seems very obvious now, but maybe not back in the day when the inventor develop this system. However, I do wonder what the court now would say if the inventor sues truck vendors for infringement.
ReplyDelete